WRITING COMMUNITY: English 106I Spring 2007

Friday, March 09, 2007

Name of interviewee, date of the interview and the questions

Name of the interviewee: Ron Burkhardt, Assistant Director of Admission Office, Purdue University
Date of the interview: March 20th
Questions:

1.What is the ethnic composition of the students at Purdue? ( diverse campus)
2.As an admission counselor in a highly ranked public universities, could you give an introduction to me what factor do you consider while deciding whether to admission an applicant to Purdue or not?
3.What’s the process that Purdue uses to evaluate an applicant?
4.How do these policies insure that Purdue is recruiting the most promising students?
5.Which students are the ones that Purdue wants to recruit?
6.Purdue is famous for its equal access policy, but the background of the applicants may vary a lot. How do Purdue insure that every applicant gets an equal opportunity to be admitted?
7.What efforts has Purdue made historically to make the admission system more equal?
8.How does Purdue evaluate an international student whose high school education could vary a lot from an America education?
9.As a public university what’s the difference in the admission policy between Purdue and some other private schools or more in a broader extent, what are the differences between public and private colleges in accepting students?
10.As an expert in college admission, in your opinion, how well are admission systems in the US working?
11.What aspects can be improved?
12.Chinese educators are only concerned about standardized test score. Do you think that standardized test are an appropriate way to ensure that every applicant has equal opportunity?
13.(If he knows something about Chinese college education innovation) The innovation in higher education application is underway in China. As an expert in this field, do you have any suggestions to give to your Chinese colleagues for reforming the admission system there?

2 Comments:

  • 1.The admission policy and equal access policy at purdue.
    2.Most of the questoins show the knowledge of the interviewee. The interviewee could answer all the questions based on his work experience.
    3.He include both opinion based and fact based questions. More opinion based quesions should be added.
    4.The questions are less provocative. It seems most of the questions are at the same emotional level.
    5.The questions are based on the logical flow. He concerned about the situation at purdue and then came out the questions envoloved with chinese students.
    6.All the questions are making sense...

    By Blogger Jingjing, at 3:17 PM  

  • In order to generate "provocative" questions, you might have to wait for some of his answers (like his views of standardized tests). If he answers one way, you might challenge him with logic used by the other side.

    For question one, I added one measure of diversity. You might ask him about others (race, country, gender, economic status).

    By Blogger TonyCimasko, at 12:34 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home